The Obscurer

Phonograph Blues

Last night I stumbled upon the Radio 2 programme Hellhounds On His Trail – The Robert Johnson Story, and very good it was too. It was a real reminder of just what a talent he had; even if his talent probably didn’t come from selling his soul to the devil, as has been suggested.

Robert Johnson was a blues singer and guitarist who died in 1938, aged around 27, and it would be interesting to consider just how popular music would have developed without him. Although he made just a handful of recordings, they directly inspired the Chicago blues boom centred around the Chess label that produced such acts as Howlin’ Wolf and Muddy Waters in the 1950’s. It was these acts that caught the imagination of many artists in the 1960’s and 1970’s and hugely influenced music during that period. Many of the biggest bands during that time, such as The Rolling Stones and Led Zeppelin, were pretty much just blues acts when they started up. Robert Johnson’s own songs have been covered by the Stones (Love In Vain), Led Zep (Travelin’ Riverside Blues), Cream (Crossroads Blues) even the Red Hot Chilli Peppers (They’re Red Hot).

Most of all I am glad I listened to the programme because it may be the spur I need to replace my old vinyl copy of “Robert Johnson – 20 Blues Greats” with a brand spanking new CD of The Complete Collection. Then I can transfer it onto the iPod mini my wife has recently obtained.

There is something wonderful about the thought of Robert Johnson on an iPod. Here is a cutting edge piece of equipment, a full 2 gb of recording space, small enough to sneak into your pocket, a sleek and beautiful design; and I can use it to listen to a raw piece of music nearly seventy years old, produced alone by a man who possessed just a guitar, a bottleneck and a haunting, eerie falsetto voice, recorded on what sounds like a primitive box stuck in the corner of the room.

By 'Eck

Meanwhile, here in Cheadle, the by-election campaign is drawing to a close. I have survived it all fairly unscathed, having fortuitously avoided Michael Howard and Charles Kennedy on their sojourns to these parts. The nearest I have got to the party machines has been studying the ground as I walked past Conservative candidate (and former MP) Stephen Day in Massie Street car park, and having to cross the High Street while pushing my son in his pushchair because Liberal Democrat Mark Hunter and his entourage were blocking the pavement outside Hampson’s bakers. Thanks.

We have been fairly inundated with leaflets, however, up to five a day, including one from Les Leggett of Veritas (currently, unbelievably, having their own leadership squabble (via NoseMonkey)) and one from John Allman of Alliance For Change (who say they put “human rights, dignity and freedoms first”, which is nice of them). What of the three main parties, though? Well, a couple of weeks ago I wrote that the Conservatives were concentrating of this issue of whether the Lib Dem candidate was an outsider, and they have continued in this vein. I don’t know if they are incredibly insular or simply trying to deceive the electorate, but Marple, where Mark Hunter lives, is local enough for me (although I think the Stephen Day tag-line of “Living Here”, based on the Lib Dem slogan “Winning Here” is quite clever).

One leaflet from the Tories lists some “Lib Dem council failures”; a fair point as Mark Hunter is leader of the council. The three specific failures the Conservatives charge the Liberal Democrats with are

1.Schools Closed
2.Council Tax Rises
3.Pavement Disgrace

Pavement disgrace? And they say the great ideological battles have all been fought out! It’s not exactly “Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite” is it? But the state of the pavements is brought up again and again in the Conservative leaflets, even quoting “one pensioner from Gatley” as saying

The pavements are a death trap and if you survive them then the traffic has to be seen to be believed, it seems to have got worse in the last four years. On top of all this the Council Tax seems to go up and up under this Lib Dem Council.

Surprised she didn’t mention that the weather has been crap since we last had a Tory MP. The Conservative leaflets have been almost entirely negative and nasty, making some dubious claims (that Cheadle Hulme police station was closed “as a consequence” of council cuts in funding to the police authority, when it was actually closed because a new police station was opened at Cheadle Heath; that to tackle that “horrendous traffic” the Lib Dem council could introduce congestion charging that could cost an extra £2000 a year) and some horrible tactics (associating the “Shocking Crime record of Mark Hunter”, because of the council’s record on issuing ASBO’s, with a Stockport Express headline “Police Warning After Rape – woman attacked in Cheadle Hulme)”.

We have only received a few Labour leaflets; the first also concentrated on the ASBO issue, the front page including a four paragraph passage from candidate Martin Miller calling for the council to make more use of the legislation the Labour government has introduced. It seems this passage was so good that it was repeated in full on the reverse…and that was about all that leaflet said. Since then Labour have also joined in with the negative campaigning, calling Mark Hunter “unfit to be our MP” and “Wanted for Crimes Against Cheadle”, even that he is a “Grave Wrecker?” as he was council leader during the “Stockport cemeteries scandal” ( a scandal that I confess has passed me by; there’s nothing on Wikipedia). Stephen Day meanwhile escaped unscathed, which seems odd for those like me who still see politics largely in terms of being for or against the Conservatives (even if I acknowledge how silly it is to hold such a position).

The Liberal Democrats have issued by far the most leaflets, as is usually the case. They started off being more positive, concentrating on their own policies rather than just slagging off the opposition, but recently they have been issuing leaflets stating “Residents blast Tory ‘tactics’” as “Stephen Day’s Tories deployed negative American style campaign tactics”; which is, of course, just a negative campaign tactic itself. Some of the Lib Dem attacks seem fair enough – for example pointing out that Mark Hunter won the election in his council ward, rather than coming third as the Conservatives stated – but overall it is sad that they have appeared unable to just rise above it. The low point for me was when we received a letter from Clive Calton, widower of former MP Patsy Calton, urging support for Mark Hunter; I guess he is entitled – and may feel obliged – to get involved, but that left a pretty bad taste in the mouth.

I generally vote Liberal Democrat out of instinct, and I will do so again; whatever my criticisms of their campaign they are nothing compared to the Conservatives’ tactics. The shame is that during the years that Stephen Day was our MP, I generally though well of him. I figured if you had to have a Tory MP then he wasn’t all that bad; but I have changed my mind now. I want him to lose tomorrow, because of his shabby campaign that the Lib Dems and Labour seem to have responded to.

Most of all, though, I will be glad when it is all over. Today I got a letter from Charles Kennedy saying “You’re no doubt fed up with all the leaflets about the by-election following the tragic death of Patsy Calton six weeks ago”. You’re not wrong, Charlie; spot on.

Update 15/7/05: Lib Dems win Cheadle by-election

Naming, Shaming

I have just been watching the Breakfast programme on BBC1, and they have a reporter in Leeds, where it appears three of the four London bombers originated. During the course of his report(which you can watch here) Graham Satchell says he has been speaking to neighbours in the streets surrounding the houses raided by police yesterday; as a result he reveals the names of three men who lived in the houses in question with the obvious implication that these are the terrorists responsible for the murders in London. Satchell stresses, however, that these names have not been confirmed by the police.

Is it just me, or is that a disgraceful and irresponsible piece of journalism? At this stage this information is just speculation, and should we really be speculating about the identity of the murderers? What if the information is inaccurate, that the names provided are incorrect due to mischief or vindictiveness on the part of those interviewed by Satchell? Innocent men could have been maligned by association with Thursday’s horror.

More likely the information is correct, but still, before the police have released these details into the public domain the families of the men concerned are seeing their sons’ names splashed across national television. Like the other people who have lost family or friends in the London bombings they are just coming to terms with the fact that their loved ones are dead; except in this case they are also having to accept that their sons or brothers are suicide bombers, and murderers.

It seems a pretty appalling way to act to me, unless you think that the sins of the son should be visited on the father; and I don’t.

UPDATE: The Guardian, The Independent and The Daily Telegraph also name the suspects, as I now suppose the rest of the media must have done. Perhaps the release of this information has been sanctioned, but it does appear to have come from neighbours rather than from official sources, and as such the whole thing still seems a bit dodgy to me.

The Solidarity Pledge

Via The Sharpener

WE DEFY TERRORISM

We pledge to assemble in London in a public demonstration of respect to the victims of the July 7 atrocity, defiance of the murderers who carried it out
and solidarity with the people of London
.

This pledge was started by the Sharpener group blog, and is being hosted on Pledgebank.

To sign it, go here.

I won’t be signing the pledge, but only because there are all manner of practical reasons why I may be unable to get to London on any given day. I don’t want to make a promise that I feel there is a good chance I won’t be able to keep. However, suffice it to say that whenever the demonstration is held I will be either

  • there in London
  • stuck at work
  • showing my solidarity at Exchange Square, Manchester (which was constructed out of the debris of the 1996 IRA bomb)

If I cannot make it to London, then I will be there in spirit, and I hope the pledge is as successful as it deserves to be.

The Simple Art Of Murder

For the second day running, London is the main story across the world’s headlines; so congratulations to the terrorists for that.
Congratulations also for leaving some husbands without wives, some children without mothers, and perhaps some parents childless. Some of the mourning may even be from the bombers’ own families. Well done.

What else have they achieved? They have reduced a bus to scrap and damaged some of the underground’s rolling stock and infrastructure. This will be repaired and replaced in time.

And they will have made the flame of islamophobia burn a little brighter in the hearts of certain morons. There are some blogs to be avoided over the next few days.

But beyond that, the achievement of the bombers ranks somewhere between nothing and fuck all. Whatever the killers aims, nothing will change; this is the lesson of history, of London and of the United Kingdom. We have been through this sort of thing before. And whatever the deluded may believe this is not a war, and planting bombs on rush hour public transport does not constitute a battle.

No, this was just a crime, an act of murder. Pure and simple.