Yearly Archives: 2009

It’s A Wonderfuel Life

I can’t say I’m happy about the changes over at Eastlands. I actually went to the City-Sunderland game – my first live match for some years – but all through Saturday evening I kept mulling over what I feel has been a disastrous and self-defeating decision. It’s truly shocking. Just when did they change the supplier for the Meat and Potato pies? I’d been looking forward to their unique qualities all Saturday and I couldn’t believe it when they fobbed me off with some bog-standard Holland’s effort for the absurd sum of £2.50. I blame the Cook. But that’s that anyway, I’m done with them; that was the last pie I ever buy at the City of Manchester Stadium.

Ha-ha, do you see what I did there? Meanwhile I just find it depressing that City’s current owners – who hitherto had seemed to be doing just about everything right at the club – decided to take a leaf out of the Big Book of Football Stereotypes and act in the impatient and short-termist way that foreign billionaire owners are expected to. It doesn’t take much to squander the vast reserves of goodwill I had for them, as I was grateful that they took over from Thaksin Shinawatra then behaved impeccably and honourably from thereon in; but that’s what they’ve done, and it will be a long hard slog for them to earn my respect again (although, being a fickle fan, winning some trophies will go some way towards doing that, no doubt).

But I’ll give them their due; they’re feeling their way into this football club ownership lark and I know where they’re coming from, as I’m feeling my way back into blogging since my recent hiatus. That’s perhaps why, on reflection, I wish I hadn’t bothered with that last post on the bankers’ bonuses, a clumsy collection of loose semi-thought bundled together in a post, the existence of which is partly thanks to the fact that I had a free afternoon. So as I’m approaching my usual Christmas sabbatical I’ll try to tidy this place up a bit and not make such a mistake again. Some hope. But in that vein I’ve ditched those weekly twitter digests that were just cluttering the place up in the absence of any other posts. If you want to read my twitterings then you can always follow them here, and they are also duplicated on my tumblelog over here; there really is no need to triplicate them, so now, if I can’t think of anything worthy of a full post then this site will simply go quiet, but I will always be back.

While in the mood to tidy up I think I’ll finish off this story from last year, because I hate leaving loose ends lying around, I really do. You’ll recall, perhaps, that British Gas had doubled our direct debit payment, despite our being in credit? Well they had. And last Winter came and went, we shovelled money to the gas board hand over fist, and in the Spring we found that those payments had just about covered our seasonal usage, and so we were still over a hundred pounds in credit. Time, perhaps, to rethink the level of our monthly payment? Well British Telecom and E-On thought so; our telecoms provider gave us two free months as we were in credit with them, while our electricity supplier refunded our credit and lowered our monthly payment. But from British Gas we heard nothing.

Summer arrived, then Autumn, during which, of course, our gas usage plummeted while our payments remained sky high, and by the time of our October statement we were now some £315 in credit. Time, now, surely, to readjust our payment amount? I’d have thought so, but perusing our gas bill I found a notice warning against this, as British Gas said that they strongly suggest we all wait until the Spring before any payment amount is altered. If only they’d stuck to this policy the previous year, when they’d hiked our monthly direct debit in Summer and Autumn; then, perhaps, our account wouldn’t have gone in credit to the value of China’s trade surplus? Well anyway, I couldn’t be bothered waiting until Spring, and I couldn’t be bothered negotiating with British Gas, so we skipped over to E-On for a dual-fuel account, a process that took around six weeks, buy which time our account had become £415 in credit. Only then, once we had left, did British Gas finally repay us.

So a happy story in the end in which everyone is a winner. E-On has a new customer; British Gas earned a paltry sum of interest on our money; and I have a tidy lump-sum to spend as I wish. I know I could moan about British Gas earning interest that should have been mine, but unless yields on pissing money against the wall have risen sharply in the past year I wouldn’t have done anything of note with that spare cash. As it is, their crazy direct debit policy has turned out to be an unlikely savings plan. So ultimately, and ironically, I end this tale with a sincere and honest “Thank you, British Gas”; because this year, after a fashion, Christmas is on you.

The Bankers’ Arms

Yesterday’s Newsnight was predictably devoted to the Pre-Budget Report – or Autumn Statement, as I sometimes inaccurately refer to it – wherein Paul Mason reported that he had spoken to some bankers in the City of London and they were livid about the announced plan to tax any discretionary bonus of theirs worth over £25,000 to the tune of 50%; some, apparently, were even considering legal action. Could you be bothered? I’d have thought that their time would be better spent picking over the cornucopia of avoidance measures that will be springing up and agonising over which one to plump for. I’m similarly puzzled at the angry claim that this will hurt our competitiveness and drive bankers abroad; not by the claim, just by the anger. Why get yourself worked up, huffing and puffing about the injustices of the world, if you can simply hop on a flight to a more friendly environ?

The thing is that, unless you are a bingo-playing pensioner who receives child benefit, there is something for everyone to grouse about from the PBR, and the bankers shouldn’t think themselves anything special. As a public sector worker I’m hardly overjoyed about the forthcoming 1% cap on pay, or the reduction in employer’s pensions contributions; but you know what? Despite the fact that my area of government can hardly be blamed for the more-than-doubling of the national debt that we are going to see, we are where we are and we all need to do our bit to get that debt down, eventually. Others have suffered far worse in this recession. “We’re all in this together,” as someone once said.

The banking sector, I would humbly suggest, bears a somewhat larger responsibility for that ballooning national debt, whether you agree that it was the cause of the crisis, or merely the meek recipient of astonishing sums of public money to prop up its ailing industry, or a bit of both. They have more of an obligation to do their bit, you could argue? And yet what are those City bankers supposed to be moaning about? Will their pay rises be capped at 1%? I doubt it. Have their pension plans just been thrown into doubt? Shouldn’t have. No, they’re apparently complaining that if their bonus – and it is just a bonus, mind, not their salary; and not even their contractual bonus, but rather any discretionary bonus they may receive on top – is greater than the median annual wage in the UK, then their employers will have to stump up a bit more tax. Well my heart bleeds.

Now, I’ve a pretty easy-come-easy-go attitude towards bonuses myself; perhaps it’s because I’ve never come to expect one, the most I ever received amounted to a little more than a couple of a hundred quid, and even then I never felt I especially deserved it. I guess I could see things differently if I relied on my bonus to enable be to buy a Maserati outright, with a discount for cash. But as it is I actually feel somewhat ambivalent on the whole subject of City bonuses. Others, however, are more forthright, and make what do seem to me to be valid criticisms; Chris states that City bonuses are a form of legal extortion, while Duncan claims that in fact the performance of RBS bankers, for example, has in fact been far from stellar. Me, I guess that if bonuses are a problem – and being manifestly unfair may not the same thing as being a problem – then regulation is a better way to deal with them than to impose a quirky, one-off novelty tax to coincide with an impending General Election, and which can probably be easily flirted in any case. In the meantime, though, my searing analysis of the situation is that if that “talent” in the City really is up in arms about something as ephemeral as their bonuses being taxed while others have lost jobs, had their hours reduced or received pay cuts, then those brightest-of-the-bright must be a bunch of utter twonks.

Twitterings: 27th November-3rd December

  • Did you miss me? #
  • Cake – http://snapshot.orange.co.uk/mm8pyz #
  • Looking forward to the City match tonight; at the very least it will end our long run of draws. #
  • Is this the worst press release ever? #

Ashes To Ashes

It was a gloriously sunny summers day, and we were sat overlooking the back garden with the patio doors wide open; the children were running around outside, playing and baiting each other as usual; my wife and my mum were chatting away, putting the world to rights; and my dad and I listened on the radio to those gripping final overs in the fifth day’s play in the First Ashes Test at Cardiff. This was always going to merit me writing a post – ideally in my start-of-the-year outing for The Obscurer Awards – as the “sporting moment of 2009″: to show how, for me, despite the alleged excitement that the newer, abbreviated Twenty20 version of the game provides, what with its boundaries and wickets galore, in fact little (and certainly nothing in Twenty20) can match the hard-to-explain tension and excitement of listening to the commentators describing the England lower order; batting, yes, yet not even really trying to score runs, just hoping to survive, to hang around a little longer, until stumps and a forced draw. In the event, though, I’m mentioning that day for another reason. It was Sunday the 12th of July, and the final time my dad visited my house. Just under two months later we were sat in Stockport Crematorium for his funeral.

Paul Auster, in The Invention of Solitude, meditates on his father’s death and talks of how, the instant he heard the bad news “I knew that I would have to write about my father”. Michael Dennis, on the other hand, said “I’ve experienced a great sadness over the past month or so, but this blog isn’t and was never meant to be confessional; while I’m happy to share some of my life online, there’s much that I keep to myself.” I figure I must be somewhere in the middle; but where? I’m unsure whether I should write here on the matter, I certainly don’t feel a need to write, and it would be far easier for me to simply pass; and yet I simultaneously feel I can’t not write something. This was never intended to be a personal blog, but how can it not be? I’ve already posted on births and deaths, such things can’t help but define us to some extent, to inform our world-view, and despite the pseudonymous nature of this blog – or perhaps because of it – I do write here from the heart.

But deciding that I can’t not write something doesn’t solve the problem of what I can write about. I must have missed the “How To…” guide to blogging for grieving sons. I could write a detailed and glowing celebration of my dad’s life, but to some extent I’ve done that already, in the script we gave the minister at the funeral. I could talk of all our happy times together and express how much I love him still, a love undimmed by circumstance; but that is perhaps just too personal, and those memories are ones I want to cherish and treasure, and keep to myself and my nearest. As this is my blog then perhaps I should simply fulfil my blog’s remit, which is to get things off my chest. I think that’s all I feel I can muster, and anyway, mere words will always fall short of what I want to say, frankly I’m not a good enough writer to successfully say what I feel truly. So here, finally, is the next best thing, version 7.4.35 of this post, the hardest thing I’ve written, and an account of my past few months. And soon I’ll press publish and be done with it.

The death of a parent is the usual tragedy, to paraphrase someone, I think; for my dad it began with the mundane and then promptly accelerated out of control. So, there was the shocking rapidity at which a concern over likely gallstones became the fear, then reality, of a tumour; how the onset of jaundice, an anaemic collapse that led to hospitalisation, a shortness of breath that necessitated the constant wearing of an oxygen mask, all seemed like minor setbacks requiring treatment which would surely lead to the road to recovery, but which instead turned out to be little more than marker posts on a relentless, steep decline. In the middle of August I left my dad to go on holiday, where I tried – and usually managed – to enjoy myself, all the while expecting to see him again, an expectation that did not come to pass. My last real sight of my dad was of him sat at home on the settee, too weak to get up, hugging his grandchildren the day before we drove to Cornwall, as we told him we’d see him in a fortnight on our return. We did manage a couple of brief webchats as we huddled around the laptop in the Sandbar at Praa Sands on our first Wednesday and second Sunday, but the final act came just the following Wednesday as I watched Radiohead play “Street Spirit (Fade Out)” from the Reading Festival via the Red Button. My mobile rang at 11:30pm; a time, to quote Auster again, when

No one calls…unless it is to give news that cannot wait. And news that cannot wait is always bad news.

And of course I knew at that moment. But there were still other possibilities, perhaps – my father, like Schrodiger’s cat, was neither alive nor dead – until I picked up my phone, and Caller ID informed me that my parents were ringing. But it wasn’t my parents, it was my mum, with the news I didn’t want to hear. Eventually I placed my phone carefully back on the window ledge but missed and let it crash onto the floor, and then I went through to my wife. In the morning we told my son, packed up, and headed home.

Small consolations occasionally broke into my mood as my wife drove us back. Given the hand that my father had been dealt, and the illness he’d suddenly been saddled with, he wanted to go when he did, he didn’t want to hang on. Over the following days there would be mood swings as I enjoyed waking in the morning, relishing that half-second before my memory would tap me on the shoulder and remind me that my dad had gone. I could be fine, talking – even laughing – in those situations where I wouldn’t expect my dad to be present, until it would hit me that there were no situations at all where he would ever be present again. I would casually refer to popping to my “mum and dad’s house”, then break down as I’d realise how redundant that term now was. Different days would lead to different emotions, as I moved through loss, anger, and feeling bereft. The day before the funeral was perhaps my lowest point; I felt hollowed out, knowing I could put it off no longer and thinking that in a day’s time my dad would finally be gone for good. The following week I returning to work; too soon, I now believe. I dreaded going in almost as much as I dreaded the funeral, and during a particularly busy hour I pretty much went to pieces, the office walls tumbling in around me.

Feelings of loss turn into a feeling of having lost, and while not exactly sorted I’m more or less adapted to the new reality now. I still hate going into work, but now it’s for all those old, boring reasons, plain old job dissatisfaction; to that extent I am back to normal. It jars less, too, referring to my dad in the past tense – although the fact that it jars less does still jar – and I am gradually getting accustomed to having joined that legion of people who begin sentences with something like “I remember once, while my dad was alive…” Many things don’t change; all my memories are still intact, I still have all those photos, it’s just that neither can ever be added to. Much of the time it still doesn’t seem quite real; it’s far easier to imagine that my dad just happens not to be here right now than to accept that he’ll never be here again; in that regard the funeral wasn’t the end of anything, as I can still happily assume him tucked away safely at home with my mum, merely a phone call away. Then I’ll be thinking about something like my daughter’s forthcoming third birthday party, planning ahead and visualising him being there as clear as day, large as life…and then I’ll heave a heavy sigh.

But I can still hear my dad’s voice in my head all the time; when I watch the match, if I pop to the shops, as I listen to the radio, especially when I hear the news. I can still anticipate his fury at the latest proposals from the government, his despair at the latest announcement from “that Gordon Brown”. While I’m unable to confirm what it is my dad thinks, let’s face it; I know. I’ve lost the person whose wrong-headed political views were always so close to hand. Wherever he is now, he’s no doubt found some sort of enlightenment and realised that in all of our many arguments I was right all along. Me, I’m going to have to find another locked door to push against. I guess this old blog could come in handy after all; so please don’t hesitate to hang around here and tell me that I’m talking bollocks. You’ll be fulfilling a vital service.

Of course, that would involve me actually writing something here, and I will, in a bit. But when I do I will still write from time to time about my father, when appropriate and fitting, as I have done many times before. In this way his story has not died, not while his loved ones still live. Yes, it’s now time to look forwards, but while my dad’s influence still remains, as strong as ever, I think he still has his part to play.

IV: Reveille
from A Shropshire Lad by A E Houseman

Wake: the silver dusk returning
Up the beach of darkness brims,
And the ship of sunrise burning
Strands upon the eastern rims.

Wake: the vaulted shadow shatters,
Trampled to the floor it spanned,
And the tent of night in tatters
Straws the sky-pavilioned land.

Up, lad, up, ’tis late for lying:
Hear the drums of morning play;
Hark, the empty highways crying
‘Who’ll beyond the hills away?’

Towns and countries woo together,
Forelands beacon, belfries call;
Never lad that trod on leather
Lived to feast his heart with all.

Up, lad: thews that lie and cumber
Sunlit pallets never thrive;
Morns abed and daylight slumber
Were not meant for man alive.

Clay lies still, but blood’s a rover;
Breath’s a ware that will not keep.
Up, lad: when the journey’s over
There’ll be time enough to sleep.

Twitterings: 28th August-3rd September

  • Still in Cornwall. #

Twitterings: 21st-27th August

  • To Cornwall. #
  • In Cornwall. #
  • The rule, regarding the sea, is that the most impressive waves will appear when your camera is in your bag. #

Twitterings: 14th-20th August

  • I've got a new set of kitchen scales! They're great, and I couldn't be happier if I'd just got an iPhone 3GS. Although I'm a bit richer. #
  • Two days of work are squatting between me and my holiday, like two great big squatting things. Fuck off, squatting things; I don't like you. #
  • Just because I want the trains to run on time, it doesn't make me a fascist. #
  • No more working for a week or three. That's me. #
  • First, Virgin Media pester us to join them. Now BT pester us to leave Virgin and join them. Except we're already *with* BT. I give up. #
  • Those were yummy pakoras. But the batter was the natural enemy of tempura. #

Twitterings: 7th-13th August

  • While the wife and kids are away I've come in from work to a beer, the cricket and a chippy tea. Fun for a night. Any longer would kill me. #
  • Foolishly, I thought Pringles "Italian Cheese" flavour would taste of Parmesan or Gorgonzola, not cheese powder and oregano. Live and learn. #
  • Who among us can, in all honesty, claim to enjoy shiny ham? #
  • My daughter cries "No, don't want it naughty step!" But that's kind of the point. #
  • Got up early for work this morning, got ready leisurely, and forgot half my stuff. Tomorrow I'll revert to my "last-minute-mad-dash" method. #
  • "If the NHS is so great, why has no other nation copied it?" is the criticism of the NHS for people who don't like to think too hard. #

Five Years

What a surprise. If you’d asked me five years ago whether I thought this blog would still be going today, I’d have replied “What’s a blog?” But if you’d asked me an hour later, after my brother had mentioned blogging in passing during a phone call, and after I’d subsequently investigated www.blogger.com and almost accidentally written my opening post here, I’d have told you that I’d doubt my interest would last five months. Or even five minutes. Yet here I am.

Why do I bother? Well, if you are in any way a regular reader you’ll know that I rarely do. This thing called “life” keeps getting in the way a lot of the time, and I am usually perfectly happy for it so to do. Unlike some of those ridiculously prolific – and for some reason, usually right-wing – bloggers out there, who seem able to spend much of their working day writing on their blogs about, say, how inefficient the public sector and its work-shy employees are, I simply don’t have the time to write anything from work, and much to my chagrin work has recently taken up more of my time that I would prefer. Even when I’m not at work, the children’s shocking lack of self-sufficiency is still such that my potential prattling-time here is often curtailed, especially during the school holidays when I am usually engaged as a metaphorical plate-spinner cum referee. Add in an impending holiday to Cornwall, and other ongoing real-life events, and with one thing and another I’m amazed I’ve even found the time to write this over-long commemoration of my five years of being largely ignored in cyberspace.

Another reason for my infrequent output is, I guess, a running out of ideas. Up until five years ago I’d had a short lifetime of pent-up pet theories with nowhere to go. That all changed with this blog, and at first there were loads of thoughts that I wanted to air and get out of my system; but now, while I wouldn’t say the well is exactly dry, it more often seems less worthwhile for me to dredge up another bundle of opinions that aren’t too dissimilar to what the next blogger is thinking. I try to write only when I think I hold an opinion that I haven’t heard expressed elsewhere, or where I feel, rightly or wrongly, that I have a different twist or angle on a subject. Very often I don’t think that is the case, and so this place will stay silent for a few weeks or more, save for those Twitter updates. Sure, the odd flurry of posts may escape me from time to time, but whether that signifies a burst of inspiration or simply the fact that I’ve found myself with a bit of time on my hands and blogging on my mind, I will leave for you to decide.

I guess I’ve settled into a frame of mind where I view my readership as imaginary – as, indeed, it largely is – and that more and more I am writing for myself alone. A case in point is this post, one of my personal favourites, and so an almost perfect example of my current attitude. Were I to visualise a real, living and breathing person reacting to reading that story, I imagine it would be a somewhat tortured, bemused and befuddled “WTF?” So I don’t do anything of the kind; I just write the thing, occasionally re-read it, and my imaginary reader, being a mirror of myself, considers it to be a piece of some worth.

It is an illusion that I think best explains the secret my longevity. If I wanted a large and loyal following for this blog then I would probably write differently and more often, and to read and comment on more blogs than I do; but I gave up that ambition of popularity long ago, and I have since become accustomed to my niche in the blogosphere. It suits me fine. And anyway, show me a really popular and frequently updated blog and the chances are, with a handful of rare exceptions, that I’ll show you a depressing, steaming pile of shite that makes one despair of humanity. The blogs I am mostly drawn to are exactly those rarely updated, quirky and often less-popular blogs where I feel more of a personal affinity with the writer, where the arrival of a new post in my RSS reader is akin to the joy of receiving a hand-written letter through the post; I often approach those more prolific bloggers’ updates in Bloglines with a heavy heart, a feeling reminiscent of hearing the thump on the mat of another load of junk from a mailing list I keep meaning to remove myself from.

So charge your glasses if you will and let’s raise a toast: to all of those infrequent bloggers out there who for me make the blogosphere what it truly is; and to those rare beasts the prolific and popular bloggers who aren’t crap, the exceptions that prove the rule, and who are usually ignored by the greater media as a consequence; and to everyone who has never written a blog, or no longer writes one, but who would (still) write a fantastic one if they did. You know who you are. And while it is considered bad form to toast yourself, since I write under a pseudonym this is me, Andy, raising a glass to my alter-ego, Quinn, and to the past five years of his witterings hereabouts.

And here’s to another five years?

Twitterings: 31st July-6th August

  • Friday morning Pavement lyric #12: "I trust you will tell me If I am making a fool of myself?" [#]
  • If it wasn't for odd socks, I wouldn't have no socks at all. [#]
  • Crying a lot, listening to "A Minor Incident" by Badly Drawn Boy. I daren't listen to Kate Bush's "This Woman's Work" in this frame of mind. [#]
  • Considering the irony of last night's The Street: an actor plays a "bigoted chef" while his best mate is played by real-life Big Cook. [#]
  • Wednesday Fact: the Great Wall of China is the only man-made object visible to the naked eye if you get your face right up close to it. [#]